Humpjones

The Digital Ghost of Everett Francis Briggs

Posted Jun 16, 2007 7 comments

Everett Francis BriggsThe Reverend E.F. Briggs died shortly before Christmas last year.  He lived in a nursing home in West Virginia at the time.  Briggs was a Catholic priest, and in his later years he felt that Holy See was coming under attack—for Briggs, America was a Christian nation, and Athiesm was a crime.  I would also like to mention that he looks exceptionally cute and cuddly in that photo. You just want to hug the old guy, don’t you?

Yes, I Mentioned a Digital Ghost

Anti God is Anti American billboard Briggs

E.F. Briggs is living a second life on the internets these days, as the ghost behind the billboard you were just reading.  He paid for a number of them and proudly displayed his address.  I have no problem with hateful old people, they’re mostly pretty funny to me.  I chose to look at them affectionately—Perry Farrell said that elderly people become like children again, and he was totally wrong about that, but it was still a great song.  If I took hateful old people seriously, they’d be very depressing.

This angle interests me a great deal—it has immense potential, and I will probably blow it completely with this article. 

But I’m still going to try, because Everett Francis Briggs is too complex for me to just make fun of.  Now that he’s dead—he’s gone, there is no more E.F. Briggs in West Virginia today—what becomes of his thoughts, his words, his hatred and fear?  I put up an unusually insane Letter to the Editor up on Brainsturbator months back—what if the lady who wrote that was dead today?  Should we not be concerned over how dangerously stupid she was?

Madonna onstage Whore of BabylonHere’s a conversation we need to have as a culture: there’s some amazingly dumb people walking around today.  I am definitely one of them.  I shouldn’t have guns at all, seriously. I am not alone—there’s hundreds of millions of people even dumber than me.  They have jobs, they operate motor vehicles, they have graduated from major universities, many of them are in positions of power and make decisions that affect the lives of thousands, sometimes millions, of other people.  Is that dangerous?

Of course it is, but what are we going to do? I talk to so many earnest young people in bars who have great plans to Save the World, and they would all work, if everyone would just agree on a few things.  It sounds simple, rational, sane, logical, workable, normal to talk about changing other people...what people need to do....you sick, sick animals.  I don’t even know who I’m aiming that at—probably myself more than any of you.

dolphin sex

Thanks For All The Fish

Allegedly, Dolphins are “The Only Other Species That Has Sex For Pleasure.” This is common sense, repeated so often by so many people that it must be suspect.  After all, consider what kind of position humanity is in to say something like that.  How exactly do we know this about dolphins? Did we ask them?  How would we determine if other species have sex for pleasure?  Especially other species that we haven’t kept in captivity, under scientific observation for the past century?  Can you see where I’m going with this?

Just the same, it’s a heavy concept: dolphins f*** for f**.  So do humans.  This is a major reason all systems of Morality are equally hilarious to me.  Unlike the vast majority of people who claim to be “religious,” I truly do consider the possibility of a Creator being (or beings) sculpting life on Earth. 

Teens Honor God Through SexThe Big Question is: how do you figure out what that Creator intended?  Through books written by humans who claim to speak for it?  Or through the actual design choices exhibited all throughout it’s creation? As we’ve seen, the system behind human sexual arousal is a very fine-tuned peice of work.  Although the biofeedback system can tell the difference between penetrative sex and masturbation, there is nothing anywhere in the hormonal or neurological detection chain that tells the body wether or not you’re married to the creature you’re having sex with.  Weird, huh? 

If God actually cared, you’d think that sort of thing would be built into the code—especially since taboos like incest have an actual biological mechanism at work behind them: your kids are exponentially more likely to have birth defects if you knock up a blood relative. 

The Digital Ghost of Humpasaur Jones

monkey masturbating in a cageThink about your digital trail.  I think about mine all the time—so much, in fact, that I’ve worked out nearly a dozen different methods to make money off my Information Halo.  Sure, I’ve got more personas than Kool Keith and James Jesus Angleton combined: so what? That’s just basic business strategy—if you can’t afford to hire employees, fabricate them wholesale.  (This only gets complicated when you’re explaining “what you do” to family members just catching up to e-mail.)

Every email you’ve sent, every e-argument where you threw an emoticon tantrum, every petty social network dispute, and man...that’s not even the meaty stuff.  How about all the pornography you’ve looked at? A hyper-detailed model of your sexual desires, laid out in day-to-day, year-to-year clarity for anyone building a psychological profile of You.

Le’ts be serious, here: do any of you honestly believe you’ll have even a ghost of a chance if some intelligence agency decided to target you?  Do you have any conception of the resources that will be brought to bear upon thy forehead, should The Powers That Be deem you a serious threat?

...and me? I’m not even a joke threat.  I’m a caged animal like the rest of you, just like all the dolphins dealing with unpaid interns watching them f*** for f** in a tank somewhere.  Taking notes on a clipboard.  Writing everything down. 

It’s science, baby—welcome to the future.

Filed in: Zeitgeist

Next entry: "Inbred Mutant Sex Fiends of God"

Previous Entry: An Interview with the Elusive Adam Kadmon

Comments

Sorry, but the comments for this entry have expired.

  • 1. Strange Loops on Jun 16, 2007 at 7:34 AM permalink

    Dude, I don’t know how I found your blog, but I really like it.

    Oh and, besides dolphins, bonobos have sex for fun and any other reason imaginable (like to get food—yes, animal prostitution). See:

    http://www.strange-loops.com/scibonobos.html

    I suspect sex for fun is more common out there in the animal kingdom than we think, but I’m too lazy to do a literature search. I’d be surprised if we don’t see plenty of animals performing mating behavior even when the female is not in heat. That’s got to at least suggest they enjoy the activity.
    -----

  • 2. myles on Jun 16, 2007 at 8:53 AM permalink

    THANK YOU. Too many people overlook Bonobos. I’m fairly certain that anything with some higher mental functions (dolphins, pigs, apes[humans]) will have sex for enjoyment. We’re wired to enjoy it so we can still want to reproduce in light of our knowledge that the world is a horrid place.  I feel that the moral restrictions we’ve placed on ourselves over millenia are what (unfortunately) separates us from monkeys running around fingering each other for shits and giggles.

  • 3. Humpasaur Jones on Jun 16, 2007 at 10:42 AM permalink

    Like I don’t say nearly enough, the readers are what makes this so worthwhile.  Thank you both!  Got a whole new research thread for a stoned saturday afternoon.

  • 4. 53880 on Jun 18, 2007 at 1:38 PM permalink

    what a chaotic post.  these ramblings must certainly have been conceived via a genetic mutant on psychedelic drugs!

    keep up the decentralization, broheim

  • 5. Daddyhill on Jun 18, 2007 at 8:53 PM permalink

    I’ve wondered about the so-called “incest taboo” for a long time.  If it’s really as hard-wired as I was always taught, then why are there so many fathers locked up or kicked out for laying hands on their daughters, in the USA alone?  Why the ever-popular joke about the virgin down South being the girl who could outrun her brothers?  In any case, while it’s true that mating with a close relative may tend to concentrate deleterious alleles in the offspring, it’s statistically just as likely to concentrate beneficial alleles.  Moreover, it turns out that some of the most notorious case studies (e.g. the Jukes and the Kallikaks), used for generations as demonstrations of the pitiful effects of inbreeding, have been shown to contain serious flaws and outright fabrications that served to bolster specious eugenics theories rather than good population genetics.  Hell, even my mother claims to have seen one of these people in eastern Ohio, with his hair growing out through the ruined crown of his hat.  Wasn’t it Lou Reed who had a line once about sometimes not believing your mother?

  • 6. Humpasaur Jones on Jun 19, 2007 at 12:26 PM permalink

    ^^I don’t think the incest taboo is “hard-wired”, no taboo is hard-wired.  Humans are evil and vicious, period.  As for the genetic info, start here:

    http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/genetics/inbreeding.htm

  • 7. iuval on Jun 19, 2007 at 9:49 PM permalink

    Studies have shown that people will unconsciously select, based on smell, people who have different immune systems to themselves, and tend to find those with the most similar immune system least attractive, or even repellent, sexually. This includes immediate family, so there is a biological disincentive for incest. I don’t have time to look this up right now, but I think that’s basically right.

    Married people still don’t smell any different to unmarried people though.